Originally by: Lucius Ventrue

---

Edited by: Lucius Ventrue on 21/08/2007 15:29:03

Originally by: Papa Ina

---

Then again I guess it's fair enough to repost this if you want to distract from the fact it was leaked onto the forums already. Maybe your pilots will think it was supposed to be posted and won't notice?

---

if you look at the time it was posted and the time i posted their nearly exact.

so either I leaked it preemptively in the SOV4 post or the spy in my alliance and I have uncanny timing

---

Originally by: Lucius Ventrue

---

Originally by: WT Snacks

---

Originally by: Lucius Ventrue

---

Edited by: Lucius Ventrue on 21/08/2007 15:29:03

Originally by: Papa Ina

---

Then again I guess it's fair enough to repost this if you want to distract from the fact it was leaked onto the forums already. Maybe your pilots will think it was supposed to be posted and won't notice?

---

if you look at the time it was posted and the time i posted their nearly exact.

so either I leaked it preemptively in the SOV4 post or the spy in my alliance and I have uncanny timing

---

If it were not RISE, I'd believe you. But seeing as RISE is known for obscuring facts and lying to it's members, I'll pass.

---

The irony coming from someone in "Anonymous Legionnaires" ?

---

Originally by: Mistae

---

Instead of questioning whether the lag was bad, very bad, terrible, or un-playable; both sides should be making the point that CCP's dismal failure at fixing this problem is utterly inexcusable.

Players invest 100s of hours into building skills and buying ships to engage in fleet battles. When a major fleet battle occurs the game engine craps out, not just some of the time but all the time. There is a term for software in which a central function is broken, namely beta software.
While winning is certainly preferable to losing. Defeating an opponent who was not handicapped by a failure of the game engine itself, is far more satisfying.
What I do not understand, is why there is not more collective outrage about CCP's refusal to fix a core aspect of the game. I say refuse because ultimately you can solve virtually all software or hardware problems if you are willing to invest the money necessary to hire the programming talent or purchase the equipment.

---

Originally by: Gneeznow

---

As for Rise, they dont smack in local, i've not seem them smack on the forums, they are generally polite and worthy of respect, but what Rise seem to fail to realise is that the dislike people have for bob is gonna be directed at them as long as they are bob pets, I like Rise a lot more than some previous bob pets we've kicked around, do yourselves a favour, and cut ties with bob, and die with some dignity instead of being thrown in with the list of other failed bob pets like Xelas, Aftermath, Fatal and ISS

---

Originally by: Dhan

---

Wow, I don't remember

the last time I saw so many

flames after a combat report.

Goons and alts, disgusting.

-dbp

---

Originally by: Stoffer Ninjapirate

---

Originally by: HydroSan

---

Originally by: Stoffer Ninjapirate

---

WHY WAS THE DREAD THERE?

---

A Moros can put out more drone DPS than a carrier with good skills.

Still doesn't explain why someone would camp a gate with one.

---

Trying to wipe out a conventional fleet with a dread is brutally stupid.

---